Web Toolbar by Wibiya
Site Tools

Want to Stay Current?

Then sign up to receive Email Updates for the site! Easy, painless, free -- and no spam! Click here to be in the know!


Site User Guide

Believe it or not, there is a page on How to Use This Site. If you haven't explored (and even if you have), you might want to check it out, so you don't miss any of the features.


Blog Filter

Click a link below to only see blog entries for that category.


Recent Posts

Click a link to read that post.


Search the Site

Use this widget to search the site, and to set your search preferences.


RSS Feed

Here is the feed for the blog. If you are interested in the feeds for the comments as well, drop me an email and I'll add them.


Universal Bookmarker

Click to Bookmark!

Social Media Links

Yes, Bruce is on Facebook and Twitter! As if this site isn't enough, now you can be annoyed by him follow him in all your favorite online communities. Click and go!

Login
« Monday Morning Rant -- Louisville Sports Radio | Main | Sunday Morning in Chicago »
Thursday
Nov122009

Who's Better With Money -- Dems or Reps?

You THINK you know the answer, don't you? You've drunk that right-wing koolaid, listened to those Faux News pundits, and you just KNOW that the Dems are the ones spending this country into oblivion, right?

Well then -- feast your eyes on THIS, Bucky ...

Isn't that classic? And all based on reports anyone can grab from the Bureau of the Public Debt.

Of course, many of us have known this for years. It's just hard to be heard over the noise from the Mighty Wurlitzer of the Right. But, as they say, a picture IS worth a thousand words, and this one certainly tells the tale.

So, next time you hear someone piss and moan about Dems running up the national debt, just send them here. We'll be glad to show them the truth.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

Bruce...they both suck, because they're all a bunch of career politicians.
But the Clinton debt reduction is FALSE...it's little more than a shift in debt...from publicly held debt to intergovernmental held debt.
I don't buy the bullshit from either side of the isle.

E

Nov 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterE

Interesting point about the Clinton debt reduction -- got any links or data? I'm a data guy, as you know, so I'd like to know if the data I've got is wrong.

Nov 18, 2009 | Registered CommenterBruce

Sorry it took me so long to get back to this...
Honestly I had forgotten I had commented.
Debt is debt, no m,atter who holds it, that's the shell game Clinton played.

Not entirely unlike how Reagan altered the rules on what and 'unemployed' person was.

Curiously, now we see the Reagan unemployment figure manipulation working it's magic once again...everyone KNOWS that the unemployment rate is 17%...but those either not looking, having exhausted their benefits, or or even on extended benefits...aren;'t counted by the government.

Why anyone would trust government is beyond me anymore.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16

Dec 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterE
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.